The Clean Core
Imperative.
Why standard tools are failing, why costs are spiraling, and the inevitable shift to Python-driven architectures.
0. Executive Summary (CIO-Facing)
SAP enterprises in the Middle East and India are entering a period of unprecedented technical pressure: S/4HANA migration deadlines, ZATCA Phase 2 real-time compliance enforcement, UAE Corporate Tax document retention policies, and HANA cost escalation. The largest hidden bottleneck? Unstructured data storage in SOFFCONT1.
This white paper presents a technical breakdown of SAP's unstructured content architecture, cost-pressure dynamics, and why SAP's native tools fail at scale.
1. The Global SAP Data Explosion (2021–2025 Analysis)
1.1 The Shift to Digital Evidence Files
Across FI/MM/SD processes, evidence files are exploding in volume: PDF invoices (AP/AR), Scanned GRN documents, Delivery Proof (POD) images. Enterprises observed a 20–38% YoY increase in content volume.
1.2 The SOFFCONT1 Bloat Phenomenon
SOFFCONT1 becomes the largest table in the SAP system and the primary HANA memory consumer. In multiple Middle East clients, PythonMate recorded 400GB–2.8TB exclusively consumed by SOFFCONT1.
1.3 Why HANA Makes This Expensive
HANA stores these binaries in in-memory column store, costing $45,000–$65,000 per TB/year on RISE vs $276–$600 per TB/year on S3/Blob.
2. SAP Content Architecture — Deep Dive
2.1 SOFFCONT1 (Binary Storage)
Stores raw binary data — PDFs, attachments, images.
2.2 SOFFPHIO & SRGBTBREL
SOFFPHIO maps metadata. SRGBTBREL keeps the link between business objects and attachments.
3. Why SAP Native Tools Fail at Scale
- RSIRPIRL Limitations: Single-threaded, timeouts after 600 seconds, RFC queue saturation.
- RSGOS_RELOCATE_ATTA Limitations: Cannot handle >20GB/hour reliably. Errors break the entire batch.
4. Clean Core Implications
SAP now enforces strict rules: No Z-table custom storage, no custom BAPI for binary routing, no core modifications. This makes Python-based migration the safest approach.
5. Cloud Storage Economics
We model TCO based on S3 Standard/IA/Glacier classes vs HANA RAM costs. The differential creates an undeniable migration ROI.
6. Regional Compliance Requirements
- KSA (ZATCA): XML/PDF-A3 archival, Cryptographic Stamp, 6-year retention.
- UAE (Corporate Tax): 7-year record retention, VAT proof-of-transaction.
- India (GST): PDF + JSON/XML dual archival required.
7. PythonMate Migration Architecture
We leverage parallel PyRFC workers, TBL1024 binary chunking, and smart retry systems to ensure 100% integrity without ABAP modifications.
8. Migration Proofing & Validation
Includes Pre-Migration integrity matrix, real-time dashboards during execution, and Post-Migration SHA-256 validation.
9. Case Study: Dubai Logistics Giant
Problem: RISE migration blocked because export too large.
Result: 2.4 TB migrated in 48 hours, 35% HANA footprint reduction, $180K year-one saving, No downtime.
10. Enterprise Engagement Model
Phase 1: Discovery → Phase 2: Blueprint → Phase 3: Migration Sprint → Phase 4: Governance Program.
11. Pricing Framework
USD-based enterprise pricing. Not per hour, but per outcome and volume.
12. Risk Mitigation Guarantees
Clean-Core Guarantee (No ABAP mods), Audit-Ready Guarantee, Integrity Guarantee (Fixed at our cost).
Start Your Assessment
No ABAP access required initially. Strict NDA. Clear financial ROI in <7 days.
Service-first: fixed-scope sprints → optional managed connectors.
We implement compliance automation — final legal responsibility resides with client counsel.